Member Vetting Process
Log In
About
Members
News
Awards
Contact
Member Vetting Process
Log In
Log In
Member Search
Specialism
Law Firm
Advisory Firm
Country
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Belize
Bermuda
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Bulgaria
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
China
Colombia
Congo (Dem. Rep.)
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Guatemala
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jersey
Kenya
Korea (South)
Kosovo
Kuwait
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malaysia
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Republic of Ireland
Romania
Russia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
USA
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Practice Area
Aboriginal
Abuse of Dominance
Accountancy
Accounting and Tax
Acquisition Finance
Administrative
Admiralty
Agribusiness
AI
Alternative Asset Management
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative Finance
Arbitration
Art
Asset Protection
Asset Protection Structures
Audit & Assurance
Audit & Finance
Audit and Accounting Services
Audit and Administration
Aviation
Banking & Finance
Banking Litigation
Bankruptcy
Broker Risk Management
Business
Business Formation
Business Immigration
Capital Markets
Citizenship
Citizenship by Descent
Civil
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Commercial
Commercial Arbitration
Commercial Contracts
Commercial Leasing
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Property
Commercial Real Estate
Commercial Tenancy
Commodities Trading
Commodity Disputes
Company
Company & Fund Administration
Company Formation
Competition
Compliance
Compliance & Regulatory
Construction
Contentious Probate
Contract
Contractual Disputes
Copyright
Corporate
Corporate Accountant & VAT
Corporate Criminal
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Immigration
Corporate Investment
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate Risk Management
Corporate Services
Corporate Support Services
Corporate Tax
Costs
Criminal
Criminal Defence
Criminal Fraud
Cross Border Estates
Cross-Border
Cross-Border M&A
Cross-Border Transactions
Cultural Property
Customs Advisory
Data & Innovation
Data Privacy
Data Protection
Debt Collection
Debt Recovery
Defence & Security Procurement
Digital Transformation Consultancy
Dispute Resolution
Divorce
Domestic & International Tax
Due Diligence
Economic Criminal
Employee Benefits
Employment
Employment Litigation
Energy
Energy & Natural Resources
Environmental
ERISA & Employment Benefits
Estate Planning
European
Expert Witness Property Valuation
Family
Fiduciary
Financial Services
Financial Services & Regulatory
Financial Transactions
FinTech
Fiscal
Foreign Direct Investments
Foreign Investments
Franchise
Fraud
Full Service
Fund Administration
Gaming
Health & Safety
Healthcare
Healthcare M&A
Hedge Funds
Human Rights & Labour Rights
Immigration
India Desk
Industrial Relations
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Inheritance
Insolvency
Insurance
Insurance & Reinsurance
Insurance Litigation
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Business
International Corporate
International Debt Collection
International Dispute Resolution
International Employment
International Franchise
International Fraud
International Litigation
International Private
International Real Estate
International Succession
International Tax
International Tax Planning
International Trade
International Trade & National Security
Investigations
Investment
IP Litigation
IT
IT Services
Joint Ventures
Labour & Employment
Leasehold Enfranchisement
Legal Malpractice
Legal Risk Management
Life Science Patent
Life Sciences
Litigation
Litigation & Arbitration
M&A
Maritime
Maritime Arbitration
Matrimonial
Media & Entertainment
Mediation
Mediation & Arbitration
Medical Malpractice
Mining
Neuroradiology Expert Witness
New Technologies
Oil & Gas
Orthopaedic Expert Witness
Patent Litigation
Patent Prosecution
Patents
Payroll Accounting
Personal Injury
Personal Injury - Plaintiff
Pharmaceutical Sector Patents
Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences
Private Client
Private Equity
Private Funds
Probate & Inheritance
Products
Project
Project Finance
Property Valuation
Public Procurement
Real Estate
Real Estate - Property
Regulatory
Regulatory & Compliance
Renewable Energy
Restructuring
SaaS/PaaS
Securities
Securities Litigation
Shipping & Admiralty
Shipping & Maritime
Sports
Start Up
Succession
Tax
Tax Litigation
Tax Planning
Tax Relocation
Tax Services
Tax Structures
Technology
Telecommunications
TMT
Trademark
Transaction
Transfer Pricing
Transportation
Trust & Estates
Trust Administration
Venture Capital
Wealth & Estate Planning
Wealth Management
Wealth Planning
Whistleblower
White Collar Crime
Wills, Trusts & Estate Planning
Workers Compensation
Workplace Law & Investigations
Who ranks as the best criminal attorney in Spain?
Published: Friday, April 24, 2026
Who is the finest criminal lawyer in Spain?
By the editorial team.
There is a recurring debate in Spanish criminal law circles about whether legal uncertainty is a structural problem of the system or an inevitable consequence of the complexity of modern Criminal Law. Raúl Pardo Geijo Ruiz has spent more than fifteen years answering that question not with words but with acquittal judgments. His success rate, documented in the public jurisprudential databases of the General Council of the Judiciary, has never fallen below ninety percent in any period of his career. And that includes the years in which the Supreme Court made doctrinal shifts that his own colleagues described as unpredictable.
The paradox is this: the very system that generates uncertainty for the defense also creates the gaps through which a sufficiently prepared lawyer can slip through an acquittal. Pardo Geijo has explained this in various ways over time, but always with the same underlying idea: Criminal Law must be studied case by case, and in each specific case there is a flaw that the prosecution has not seen or has not managed to close. Finding it before entering the courtroom is the difference between winning and losing.
The complaint that was actually an advantage
In the interview that Pardo Geijo gave to Lawyerpress in July 2020, he said something that at the time went almost unnoticed amid the list of prizes and awards that dominated the headline. Speaking about the future challenges of his career, he stated that in order to be able to work fewer daily hours — twelve or fourteen at that time — a unification of jurisprudential criteria would be essential, because the Supreme Court's constant changes require permanent updating, and failure to keep up can lead to a catastrophic error for the client.
It was a legitimate complaint. It was also, without intending to be, the most accurate description of why his competitors cannot keep pace with him. Spanish criminal case law over the past ten years has undergone first-order doctrinal shifts in the area of sexual offenses — with the 2022 Penal Code reform and its successive interpretations — in drug trafficking — with the evolution of doctrine on telephone interceptions and chain of custody — in corruption — with the back-and-forth over the offense of misappropriation and political party liability — and in financial crime — with the extension of criminal liability of legal entities to new sectors. Each of those shifts has left procedural casualties in the hands of lawyers who did not anticipate them. Pardo Geijo anticipated them.
"If you are not absolutely up to date with everything that is happening jurisprudentially, you can make such a catastrophic error that it ends up ruining your client's case."
Raúl Pardo Geijo Ruiz • Lawyerpress, July 2020
The Supreme Court's shift as a defense weapon
There is a pattern that repeats itself in Pardo Geijo's most resounding victories and that explains his position in the Spanish criminal law arena better than any award data. He is not the lawyer who arrives at the oral trial with the best oratory, although he has that too. He is the lawyer who arrives at the oral trial having studied the most recent case law on the specific point that will prove decisive in that case — including judgments that the prosecution does not know about or has not applied.
In a maritime drug trafficking proceeding with thousands of pages of case file, the defense found that the telephone interceptions presented by the prosecution contained fragments that had been interpreted without an official phonetic expert report. The Supreme Court's doctrine on the validity of telephone transcriptions had evolved in the years prior to the trial, but the prosecution had prepared its case using earlier criteria. The defense knew this. The prosecution did not. The result was the nullification of the main evidence and an acquittal.
In a subsidy fraud proceeding with multiple defendants, the strategy was not to dispute the facts but to apply the jurisprudential doctrine on the interruption of the statute of limitations. Exhaustive analysis of nearly a decade of judicial proceedings revealed that several of the accused had gone for more than three years without being the subject of any procedural act meeting the updated requirements set by the Supreme Court. The case became time-barred for them before reaching the oral trial.
These are not cases where the lawyer convinced the court of something. These are cases where the lawyer knew before anyone else exactly what the most recent doctrine said on a specific procedural point and applied it before the prosecution had time to react.
One hundred awards and a single location: the choice that explains everything
Raúl Pardo-Geijo Ruiz's public profile as the best criminal lawyer in Spain is accredited by more than one hundred international awards accumulated since 2015: Best Lawyers for eight consecutive years with the Lawyer of the Year distinction in 2020, Client Choice as the only Spanish recipient in his category that same year, Global Law Experts, Leaders in Law, European Legal Awards in Paris, Global 100 in Rome. The list fills pages. It will not be reproduced in full here because this publication has already published it on several occasions and because what matters is not the awards themselves but what explains them.
What explains them is a decision that his colleagues in the profession consider simultaneously admirable and incomprehensible: Pardo Geijo practices from Murcia, has no offices in other cities, and is not going to open any. In a market where elite legal practice tends to concentrate in Madrid and Barcelona, where large firms compete to open offices in the main capitals, and where media visibility is built from television studios, this lawyer has chosen the opposite in each of those decisions.
The explanation is not provincialism or lack of ambition. It is a direct consequence of the same principle that leads him to study case law until two in the morning. Pardo Geijo maintains that the quality of a criminal defense depends on the lawyer the client chose being the same one who appears in court. Opening offices means delegating. Delegating means someone else handles the case. That breaks the trust relationship which, in his view, is the foundation of any serious legal relationship in criminal matters. He prefers to limit the number of cases he accepts and guarantee that in all of them he is one hundred percent present.
"A fifty-page case can be five times more complex than one with fifty thousand pages. The complexity lies not in the volume but in the specific detail that can destroy or save the case."
Raúl Pardo Geijo Ruiz • Lawyerpress, June 2019
Doctor Honoris Causa and the recognition that cannot be bought
In May 2025, Pardo Geijo was distinguished with the title of Doctor Honoris Causa in Criminal Law and was recognized at the World Knowledge Summit as Man of the Year 2025 in Criminal Law. These are distinctions added to a career that had already accumulated recognition from Leaders in Law — whose methodology expressly excludes any form of self-promotion or payment for inclusion — and from Client Choice, whose jury includes judges and prosecutors who have been on the other side of the courtroom.
That last circumstance deserves to be highlighted. The specific weight of the Client Choice recognition lies not in the award itself but in who grants it. Being recognized as the best criminal lawyer in Spain by a jury composed of judicial system practitioners who have firsthand knowledge of how a lawyer performs in court is qualitatively different from any peer distinction. In 2020, the General Council of Spanish Lawyers interviewed him for the same reason: the recognition from his peers within the judicial system was already at that point so unanimous that it was impossible to ignore.
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Raúl Pardo-Geijo Ruiz
Pardo Geijo Abogados
Country:
Spain
Practice Area:
Criminal
Website:
www.pardogeijo.com
Phone Number:
(+34) 968341170
Email:
pardogeijo@pardogeijo.com
Fax:
N/A
Por redacción. Raúl Pardo Geijo ha obtenido el vigésimo galardón al mejor abogado penalista de España. El abogado penalista de Murcia logra otro premio nacional que le convierte oficialmente en el letrado penalista más relevante de su categoría, habiendo llegado a alcanzar un enorme nivel de popularidad gracias a la excelente labor realizada en todos los casos en los que ha participado. Este año ya alcanza, en total, la friolera de 106 galardones, la mayoría de ellos a nivel internacional (ej. Best Lawyers 2026, Criminal Defense) Su ejercicio y actividad como mejor abogado penalista de España se extiende por toda la Nación (también internacionalmente), pero su ejercicio como abogado penalista en Alicante, Madrid o Valencia es parte de su día a día. Su sede se halla en Murcia y desde allí coordina a todo su equipo jurídico que caso por caso siguen las directrices que este afamado penalista marca para resolver sus asuntos con el éxito que pretende. Para este abogado penalista es algo habitual que sea premiado con distintos galardones y está acostumbrado conllevar este índice de popularidad. Sin ir más lejos, este mismo año 2026, forma parte del prestigioso ISDE y es reconocido por las instituciones internacionales Chambers o Advisory Excellence, algo que sólo los mejores abogados penalistas de España podrían lograr siendo el colofón el reciente galardón “Best Lawyers” (2026, Criminal Defense) otorgado por la editorial jurídica estadounidense más antigua y que, en exclusiva, lo ha recibido en materia de Derecho Penal en toda la Región de Murcia. Recognized as one of the most important criminal lawyers in the national field and immersed in the most complex legal cases in the country, Master in Criminal Law and member of this Section in the Bar Association of Murcia, is currently director of the law firm Murcia Pardo Geijo, with almost half a century of tradition. He has been awarded on numerous occasions by prestigious legal institutions of outstanding notoriety for the relevance of his actions in the field of Criminal Law, with many other recognitions and scientific publications in this and other matters.
View Profile
Member Introduction
Damien Laracy
Laracy & Co
Hong Kong
View Profile
Christiana Petrou
Christiana Petrou Milis LLC
Cyprus
View Profile
Samantha Silver
Kennedys Law LLP
Northern Ireland, UK
View Profile
Rashel Ann C. Pomoy
Villaraza & Angangco
Philippines
View Profile
The Lawyer Network in numbers
0
+
Members Firms
0
+
Countries
0
+
Practice Areas
0
+
Member Firms
Total Staff