Member Vetting Process
Log In
About
Members
News
Awards
Contact
Member Vetting Process
Log In
Log In
Member Search
Specialism
Law Firm
Advisory Firm
Country
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Bermuda
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Bulgaria
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Guatemala
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jersey
Kenya
Korea (South)
Kosovo
Kuwait
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malaysia
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Ireland
Romania
Russia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
US Virgin Islands
USA
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Practice Area
Accountancy
Acquisition Finance
Administrative
Admiralty
Advertising
Agribusiness
AI
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative Finance
Arbitration
Art
Asset Protection
Asset Protection Structures
Audit & Finance
Aviation
Banking & Finance
Bankruptcy
Broker Risk Management
Business
Business Formation
Capital Markets
Citizenship
Civil
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Commercial
Commercial Arbitration
Commercial Contracts
Commercial Leasing
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Real Estate
Commodities Trading
Commodity Disputes
Company
Company Formation
Competition
Compliance
Compliance & Regulatory
Construction
Contentious Probate
Contract
Copyright
Corporate
Corporate Accountant & VAT
Corporate Criminal
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Immigration
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate Risk Management
Corporate Support Services
Corporate Tax
Costs
Criminal
Criminal Defence
Cross Border Estates
Cross-Border
Cross-Border Transactions
Cultural Property
Customs Advisory
Data & Innovation
Data Protection
Debt Collection
Debt Recovery
Defence & Security Procurement
Dispute Resolution
Divorce
Due Diligence
Economic Criminal
Employment
Employment Litigation
Energy
Energy & Natural Resources
Environmental
ERISA & Employment Benefits
Estate Planning
European
Family
Fiduciary
Financial Services
Financial Services & Regulatory
Financial Transactions
FinTech
Fiscal
Foreign Direct Investments
Foreign Investments
Franchise
Full Service
Gaming
Health & Safety
Healthcare
Healthcare M&A
Human Rights & Labour Rights
Immigration
India Desk
Industrial Relations
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Inheritance
Insolvency
Insurance
Insurance & Reinsurance
Insurance Litigation
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Business
International Corporate
International Debt Collection
International Dispute Resolution
International Franchise
International Fraud
International Litigation
International Private
International Real Estate
International Tax
International Tax Planning
International Trade
International Trade & National Security
Investigations
Investment
IP Litigation
IT
Joint Ventures
Labour & Employment
Leasehold Enfranchisement
Legal Malpractice
Legal Risk Management
Life Science Patent
Life Sciences
Litigation
Litigation & Arbitration
M&A
Maritime
Matrimonial
Media & Entertainment
Mediation
Medical Malpractice
Mining
Neuroradiology Expert Witness
New Technologies
Oil & Gas
Orthopaedic Expert Witness
Patent Litigation
Patents
Personal Injury
Personal Injury - Plaintiff
Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences
Private Client
Private Equity
Private Funds
Probate & Inheritance
Project
Project Finance
Property
Public Procurement
Real Estate
Real Estate - Property
Regulatory
Renewable Energy
Restructuring
SaaS/PaaS
Securities
Securities Litigation
Shipping & Admiralty
Shipping & Maritime
Shipping Finance
Sports
Start Up
Tax
Tax Litigation
Tax Planning
Tax Relocation
Tax Structures
Technology
TMT
Trademark
Transaction
Transportation
Trust & Estates
Trust Administration
Venture Capital
Wealth & Estate Planning
Wealth Management
Wealth Planning
Whistleblower
White Collar Crime
Workers Compensation
Possibility of formal warnings in response to violations of the GDPR
Published: Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Whether a violation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) constitutes a violation of competition law and can therefore, as a matter of law, give rise to a formal written warning is still disputed.
Many were concerned that the General Data Protection Regulation, GDPR for short, entering into force would herald a veritable wave of written warnings in response to violations of the Regulation. These concerns have so far proven unfounded. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that one probable reason for this is the sheer lack of consistency in the case law to date on whether a violation of the GDPR constitutes a violation of competition law and can thus lead to a formal written warning.
The courts have thus far delivered different rulings on the matter. The Landgericht Würzburg, the Regional Court of Würzburg, found in one case involving a violation of the GDPR that it represented a violation of Germany’s Unfair Competition Act, the Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG). It held that competitors could issue a formal written warning as a result of the violation of competition law or sue for an injunction or damages (Az.: 11 O 174/18 UWG).
The Landgericht Bochum, the Regional Court of Bochum, reached a different conclusion. It ruled in a judgment from August 7, 2018 that violations of the GDPR do not constitute violations of competition law and competitors are therefore not allowed to issue formal warnings in response to them (Az.: I-12 O 95/18). In the case in question, an online merchant had been issued with a formal warning as well as an injunction suit by a rival business for violating the GDPR. The LG Bochum dismissed the claim, ruling that the provisions in articles 77 to 84 of the Regulation dealing with claims brought by competitors are exhaustive. Accordingly, only certain institutions and organizations that are not intent on making a profit are entitled to safeguard the interests of those affected. The Court therefore concluded that the legislature wanted to avoid the possibility of competitors being issued with formal written warnings for violations of the GDPR.
The different interpretations in the case in the law suggest that the GDPR will continue to occupy the courts for some time yet. To avoid legal disputes, businesses and traders ought to assess whether they are complying with data protection requirements. Violations can potentially lead not only to formal warnings from competitors but also heavy fines imposed by supervisory authorities. Lawyers who are experienced in the field competition law can offer advice.
https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/competition-law.html
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Member Introduction
Devin Sefton
Braumiller Law Group
Michigan, USA
View Profile
Bruce H. Leeds
Braumiller Law Group
California, USA
View Profile
John S. Upton, Esq.
Perkins Thompson, P.A.
Maine, USA
View Profile
Ron S. Geffner
Sadis
New York, USA
View Profile
The Lawyer Network in numbers
0
+
Members Firms
0
+
Countries
0
+
Practice Areas
0
+
Member Firms
Total Staff