Member Search

Professional Indemnity Claims and Renewals – Pitfalls and Good Practice

Published: Monday, January 4, 2016

It is almost inevitable in today’s litigious times that a busy solicitors practice will at some point find itself the subject of a claim – with or without foundation. It is not always a straightforward matter, however, to identify when a disgruntled client has turned into a potential claimant – and yet there could be serious consequences if a firm fails to notify its insurers of a potential claim in good time.

Professionals dealing with professional indemnity insurance renewal will be aware, of course, that the firm’s claims history will affect the premium payable for insurance and even whether cover will be offered by some insurers.  It cannot be taken for granted that a firm will have a range of choices for insurance cover, or even that cover will be offered at all for some firms.  It is of key importance to the business, therefore, to get the balance right when dealing with the firm’s claims and renewals processes.

Appropriate cover in place?

It is also essential to ensure that the firm has the right level of cover in place.  With effect from 1 April 2015 a new Outcome is introduced into the SRA Code of Conduct 2011:

O(7.13) requires the firm to “assess and purchase the level of professional indemnity insurance cover that is appropriate for your current and past practice, taking into account potential levels of claim by your clients and others and any alternative arrangements you or your client may make.”

Firms must be compliant with this obligation by the earlier of the date on or after 1 April 2015 of the commencement, renewal, replacement or agreed extension of the policy period of any qualifying insurance, or the start of the new indemnity period on 1 October 2015.

What to notify?

Solicitors’ professional indemnity insurance policies work on a “claims made” basis, covering claims or circumstances first notified during the policy period.  Identifying claims which ought to be notified is crucial.  In the current era where it is usual for firms to shop around for the best value insurance cover, it is possible that a firm may have cover with a different insurer each year.   In that situation it is particularly important that the firm has given notice of all claims as soon as possible to avoid an insurer alleging prejudice as a result of having to deal with a claim that should have been notified in a previous insurance period to a different insurer.  A firm could then find itself having to meet such a claim out of its own pockets.

What amounts to a “circumstance” that can be notified has, naturally, been the subject of litigation (eg Kidsons v Lloyds [2009] Lloyd’s Rep IT 178).  A common sense approach can be taken, taking into account the severity of the issue, how prolonged the complaint is, and whether a client’s interests appear to be prejudiced.  If a firm is aware of facts which could result in a claim being made against the firm, then presenting a notification of the relevant facts can protect the firm’s indemnity position if such a claim is pursued even outside of that policy period. 

To ensure that complaints which could be considered to be claims are not overlooked, it is important that all staff are aware of and updated in relation to the firm’s policy on notifying complaints to the firm’s nominated complaints handling partner, who will have to decide how to deal with the information.  Having an appropriate risk management strategy and complaints handling system in place is a requirement for all firms and evidence of these systems will be something that insurers will take into account during the process of placing and renewal of business. The firm’s compliance officer for legal practice (COLP) is responsible for ensuring that adequate controls are in place.

Renew or Replace?

It makes sense for a business to seek the most competitive rate available for professional indemnity insurance, but the cheapest quote is not necessarily best for the business.  Speaking to a reputable insurance broker who knows the Professional Indemnity Insurance market and doing your own homework will pay dividends when it comes to finding the best insurance for the firm. 

Firms can now choose from a wide variety of insurers, some well-known names and others new to the market.  Insurers who are authorised to conduct business in the UK can become a participating insurer (- previously known as  qualifying insurers) in the solicitors professional indemnity insurance market provided they sign the Participating Insurer's Agreement under which they agree to offer policies which meet the set Minimum Terms and Conditions. These insurers are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, but it is important to give consideration their pedigree: importantly, the SRA does not undertake any solvency checks on insurers and does not require a minimum level of financial security for participation in the solicitors' PII market.   Financial stability of the insurer cannot be taken for granted, as many solicitors’ firms will be aware, following the demise of Quinn, Balva and Lemma. The SRA has, however, introduced a transparency requirement for all participating insurers. Insurers must disclose whether or not they have a financial security rating and the provider of this rating.

Also of importance is the claims handling services of the insurer – should you be facing a claim you want to know that you can rely on experienced claim handlers to deal with your firm and former client efficiently and fairly throughout what may be a time consuming and taxing process.  The claims handling experience of a firm may be a significant factor in deciding whether to renew with a particular insurer.  In today’s competitive market professional indemnity insurers wanting to attract business from reputable, financially sound firms should want to demonstrate the quality of the service they provide in relation to dealing with claims and any extra support on offer, which could, for example, include risk management support.

Checklist for Renewal Time

1.    Plan ahead and expect the process to take longer than you think - diarise an early reminder. A failure to have insurance in place will result in sanctions by the SRA.  

2.    Remember that there is no longer a compulsory start date of 1 October for the policy period, so it is possible to work towards a policy period that suits your firm’s timescale.

3.    Consider and gather the information that needs to be disclosed to the insurer – statistics about practice types, claims history, and in particular are there claims or circumstances which have arisen which should be notified before the start of the new policy?

4.    Make sure all staff are aware of and updated in relation to the firm’s policy on notifying complaints and circumstances.

5.    Consider the appropriate level of cover required in light of the information gathered – a new required Outcome under the SRA Code of Conduct.

6.    Shop around for competitive quotes – using a reputable insurance broker can be a good option to save valuable time for busy partners in practice.

7.    Consider the pedigree of the insurer – (i) in terms of financial stability (ii) in terms of claims handling services (iii) are additional support services offered, for example in risk management?

8.    If renewing with the same insurer double check that all the information provided is accurate – do not simply rely on the prior year’s statement of information.

9.    Read the policy wording – the Minimum Terms and Conditions are updated from year to year, and can include new definitions and exclusions.

Looking Ahead – The Insurance Act 2015

In February this year the Insurance Act 2015 received royal assent, and it will come into force in August 2016.  This means the Act will apply when a lot of firms are engaged in the next round of renewals.   Before that time it is important that the partners responsible for dealing with professional indemnity insurance become familiar with the new terminology and requirements under this Act.

The Insurance Act 2015 brings about dramatic changes to existing insurance law which will be relevant for all businesses.   The pre-contract disclosure duty will become a duty to give a “fair presentation of the risk”.   Circumstances in which insurers can decline to cover claims are dealt with in the Act, and the current position in relation to “basis of contract” clauses is changed.  It remains to be seen what changes may be made to the Solicitors’ Minimum Terms and Conditions.  Next year brings a new insurance landscape.

Chloë Phillips, Consultant, BLM


Country:
England, UK
Practice Area:
Legal Risk Management
Website:
Phone Number:
0161 236 5446
Fax:
N/A
Mike is the senior partner at BLM, the leading risk and insurance law business in the UK & Ireland and specialises in advising insurers, Lloyd's syndicates, underwriters, MGA's, brokers, corporates, public sector bodies, professional indemnifiers, and other risk and insurance market place organisations. Mike is responsible for the leadership and business development of the firm, it’s strategy and policy making, mergers, bolt ons and acquisitions. As well as this, Mike chairs the Executive Board and Partnership Board

Member Introduction

The Lawyer Network in numbers

0+

Members Firms

0+

Countries

0+

Practice Areas

0+

Member Firms
Total Staff