Member Vetting Process
Log In
About
Members
News
Awards
Contact
Member Vetting Process
Log In
Log In
Member Search
Specialism
Law Firm
Advisory Firm
Country
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Bermuda
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Bulgaria
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Guatemala
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jersey
Kenya
Korea (South)
Kosovo
Kuwait
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malaysia
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Ireland
Romania
Russia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
US Virgin Islands
USA
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Practice Area
Accountancy
Acquisition Finance
Administrative
Admiralty
Advertising
Agribusiness
AI
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative Finance
Arbitration
Art
Asset Protection
Asset Protection Structures
Audit & Finance
Aviation
Banking & Finance
Bankruptcy
Broker Risk Management
Business
Business Formation
Capital Markets
Citizenship
Civil
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Commercial
Commercial Arbitration
Commercial Contracts
Commercial Leasing
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Real Estate
Commodities Trading
Commodity Disputes
Company
Company Formation
Competition
Compliance
Compliance & Regulatory
Construction
Contentious Probate
Contract
Copyright
Corporate
Corporate Criminal
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Immigration
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate Risk Management
Corporate Support Services
Corporate Tax
Costs
Criminal
Criminal Defence
Cross Border Estates
Cross-Border
Cross-Border Transactions
Cultural Property
Customs Advisory
Data & Innovation
Data Protection
Debt Collection
Debt Recovery
Defence & Security Procurement
Dispute Resolution
Divorce
Due Diligence
Economic Criminal
Employment
Employment Litigation
Energy
Energy & Natural Resources
Environmental
ERISA & Employment Benefits
Estate Planning
European
Family
Fiduciary
Financial Services
Financial Services & Regulatory
Financial Transactions
FinTech
Fiscal
Foreign Direct Investments
Foreign Investments
Franchise
Full Service
Gaming
Health & Safety
Healthcare
Healthcare M&A
Human Rights & Labour Rights
Immigration
India Desk
Industrial Relations
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Inheritance
Insolvency
Insurance
Insurance & Reinsurance
Insurance Litigation
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Business
International Corporate
International Debt Collection
International Dispute Resolution
International Franchise
International Fraud
International Litigation
International Private
International Real Estate
International Tax
International Tax Planning
International Trade
International Trade & National Security
Investigations
Investment
IP Litigation
IT
Joint Ventures
Labour & Employment
Leasehold Enfranchisement
Legal Malpractice
Legal Risk Management
Life Science Patent
Life Sciences
Litigation
Litigation & Arbitration
M&A
Maritime
Matrimonial
Media & Entertainment
Mediation
Medical Malpractice
Mining
Neuroradiology Expert Witness
New Technologies
Oil & Gas
Orthopaedic Expert Witness
Patent Litigation
Patents
Personal Injury
Personal Injury - Plaintiff
Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences
Private Client
Private Equity
Private Funds
Probate & Inheritance
Project
Project Finance
Property
Public Procurement
Real Estate
Real Estate - Property
Regulatory
Renewable Energy
Restructuring
SaaS/PaaS
Securities
Securities Litigation
Shipping & Admiralty
Shipping & Maritime
Shipping Finance
Sports
Start Up
Tax
Tax Litigation
Tax Planning
Tax Relocation
Tax Structures
Technology
TMT
Trademark
Transaction
Transportation
Trust & Estates
Trust Administration
Venture Capital
Wealth & Estate Planning
Wealth Management
Wealth Planning
Whistleblower
White Collar Crime
Workers Compensation
Legality of advertising with statements on the effects of medical treatments
Published: Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Advertisements featuring statements on the effects of medical treatments are only permissible if they are supported by sound scientific evidence. This was reaffirmed by the Oberlandesgericht (OLG) Frankfurt, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt.
Advertisements featuring health claims are subject to stringent requirements regarding the accuracy and ambiguity of the relevant statements. This is because misleading health claims can pose a significant risk to patients. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that for this reason statements on the effects of a medical treatment are generally only permissible if they are based on sound scientific evidence.
In a judgment from 21 June 2018, the Oberlandesgericht Frankfurt reaffirmed that advertisements featuring statements on the effects of medical treatments are permitted as long as there is no indication that the statement on their effects is contentious or that it lacks any scientific basis. The Court went on to say that if the advertising statement is contentious, the party responsible for the advertising needs to demonstrate that the statement is accurate and the scientific basis for the promised effects must already be documented at the time of the advertisement’s release (Az.: 6 U 74/17).
In the instant case, a doctor had promoted various treatment methods from the field of osteopathy on his homepage, including treatment procedures associated with craniosacral osteopathy. An association of commercial enterprises brought an action for an injunction against this. It viewed the treatment methods in question as belonging to the field of alternative medical treatments lacking scientific proof of their efficacy.
The action was partially successful. The OLG Frankfurt held that the doctor could continue to advertise with the statements on the efficacy of the general and infant osteopathic treatment methods. The Court stated that in this regard the plaintiff had failed to sufficiently make the case that the methods being promoted were not reliable as a whole and for the advertised indications. However, it took a different view with respect to the statements on craniosacral osteopathy, stating that the plaintiff had demonstrated that there was no sound scientific basis to support the effectiveness of the treatment methods in question. The OLG went on to note that study findings are only deemed to be sound if based on double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trials.
Misleading advertising or violations of competition law can quickly lead to formal warnings, damages claims or injunction suits. Lawyers who are experienced in the field of competition law can serve as competent advisors.
https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/competition-law.html
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Member Introduction
Stephen Vlock
Vlock & Associates, P.C.
New York, USA
View Profile
Albert Sidney Golbert
Golbert & Associates
California, USA
View Profile
Mark Krasner
Blanchard, Krasner and French
Nevada, USA
View Profile
Koen Lozie
Aver Associates
New York, USA
View Profile
The Lawyer Network in numbers
0
+
Members Firms
0
+
Countries
0
+
Practice Areas
0
+
Member Firms
Total Staff