Member Vetting Process
Log In
About
Members
News
Awards
Contact
Member Vetting Process
Log In
Log In
Member Search
Specialism
Law Firm
Advisory Firm
Country
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belgium
Bermuda
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
British Virgin Islands
Bulgaria
Cameroon
Canada
Cayman Islands
Chile
China
Colombia
Costa Rica
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
Egypt
El Salvador
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Guatemala
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Israel
Italy
Japan
Jersey
Kenya
Korea (South)
Kosovo
Kuwait
Lebanon
Liechtenstein
Luxembourg
Macau
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malaysia
Malta
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Monaco
Morocco
Netherlands
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Nigeria
Norway
Pakistan
Panama
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Poland
Portugal
Qatar
Republic of Ireland
Romania
Russia
Saint Kitts and Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Singapore
Slovakia
Slovenia
South Africa
Spain
Sri Lanka
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tanzania
Thailand
Togo
Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turks and Caicos Islands
UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
US Virgin Islands
USA
Vietnam
Zimbabwe
Practice Area
Accountancy
Acquisition Finance
Administrative
Admiralty
Advertising
Agribusiness
AI
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Alternative Finance
Arbitration
Art
Asset Protection
Asset Protection Structures
Audit & Finance
Aviation
Banking & Finance
Bankruptcy
Broker Risk Management
Business
Business Formation
Capital Markets
Citizenship
Civil
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Commercial
Commercial Arbitration
Commercial Contracts
Commercial Leasing
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Real Estate
Commodities Trading
Commodity Disputes
Company
Company Formation
Competition
Compliance
Compliance & Regulatory
Construction
Contentious Probate
Contract
Copyright
Corporate
Corporate Criminal
Corporate Finance
Corporate Governance
Corporate Immigration
Corporate Restructuring
Corporate Risk Management
Corporate Support Services
Corporate Tax
Costs
Criminal
Criminal Defence
Cross Border Estates
Cross-Border
Cross-Border Transactions
Cultural Property
Customs Advisory
Data & Innovation
Data Protection
Debt Collection
Debt Recovery
Defence & Security Procurement
Dispute Resolution
Divorce
Due Diligence
Economic Criminal
Employment
Employment Litigation
Energy
Energy & Natural Resources
Environmental
ERISA & Employment Benefits
Estate Planning
European
Family
Fiduciary
Financial Services
Financial Services & Regulatory
Financial Transactions
FinTech
Fiscal
Foreign Direct Investments
Foreign Investments
Franchise
Full Service
Gaming
Health & Safety
Healthcare
Healthcare M&A
Human Rights & Labour Rights
Immigration
India Desk
Industrial Relations
Information Technology
Infrastructure
Inheritance
Insolvency
Insurance
Insurance & Reinsurance
Insurance Litigation
Intellectual Property
International Arbitration
International Business
International Corporate
International Debt Collection
International Dispute Resolution
International Franchise
International Fraud
International Litigation
International Private
International Real Estate
International Tax
International Tax Planning
International Trade
International Trade & National Security
Investigations
Investment
IP Litigation
IT
Joint Ventures
Labour & Employment
Leasehold Enfranchisement
Legal Malpractice
Legal Risk Management
Life Science Patent
Life Sciences
Litigation
Litigation & Arbitration
M&A
Maritime
Matrimonial
Media & Entertainment
Mediation
Medical Malpractice
Mining
Neuroradiology Expert Witness
New Technologies
Oil & Gas
Orthopaedic Expert Witness
Patent Litigation
Patents
Personal Injury
Personal Injury - Plaintiff
Pharmaceuticals & Life Sciences
Private Client
Private Equity
Private Funds
Probate & Inheritance
Project
Project Finance
Property
Public Procurement
Real Estate
Real Estate - Property
Regulatory
Renewable Energy
Restructuring
SaaS/PaaS
Securities
Securities Litigation
Shipping & Admiralty
Shipping & Maritime
Shipping Finance
Sports
Start Up
Tax
Tax Litigation
Tax Planning
Tax Relocation
Tax Structures
Technology
TMT
Trademark
Transaction
Transportation
Trust & Estates
Trust Administration
Venture Capital
Wealth & Estate Planning
Wealth Management
Wealth Planning
Whistleblower
White Collar Crime
Workers Compensation
ECJ – Distinctive character necessary for registration as EU trade mark
Published: Wednesday, May 29, 2019
For a sign to be capable of being registered as an EU trade mark, it must be distinctive across the entire European Union. This was confirmed by the Court of Justice of European Union (ECJ) in a ruling from 25 July 2018.
According to the ECJ’s case law, a sign lacking original distinctive character can only be registered as an EU trade mark if it has acquired distinctive character in the part of the EU where it previously lacked this quality. The relevant part of the EU may consist of a single member state. We at the commercial law firm GRP Rainer Rechtsanwälte note that for the purposes of registering such a mark, it is not enough to demonstrate that it has acquired this distinctive character across a significant portion of the EU.
It is in light of this that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) must now re-examine whether the registration of the three-dimensional shape of a chocolate bar as an EU trade mark ought to be upheld following a ruling of the ECJ from 25 July 2018 (Az.: C-84/17 P). The EUIPO had registered the sign as an EU trade mark as early as 2006. Another food producer requested that the mark be declared invalid but to no avail. The EUIPO rejected the request, reasoning that the mark had acquired distinctive character by virtue of its use within the EU.
However, the General Court of the European Union overturned this decision in late 2016, ruling that the necessary distinctive character had only been demonstrated with respect to part of the European Union but not in relation to the rest of the relevant public. The EUIPO and the trade mark owner were skeptical of whether it is necessary for the owner of a trade mark to demonstrate distinctive character with regard to each and every member state, arguing that this is not consistent with the principle of uniformity of EU trade marks or indeed the single market.
The ECJ has since reaffirmed the Court’s decision in a recent ruling, stating that while it is not necessary to prove that the mark in question has acquired distinctive character through use in relation to each and every member state of the EU, the evidence presented must be capable of demonstrating that distinctive character has been acquired in all member states where the sign previously lacked original distinctive character. It now falls to the EUIPO to adjudicate once again on the registration of the mark.
Lawyers who are experienced in the field of intellectual property law can advise on all matters pertaining to trade mark registration and protection.
https://www.grprainer.com/en/legal-advice/ip-law/trademark-law.html
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Member Introduction
Mark Krasner
Blanchard, Krasner and French
Nevada, USA
View Profile
John Genga
Genga & Associates
California, USA
View Profile
Daniel Cragg
Eckland & Blando
Minnesota, USA
View Profile
Bruce H. Leeds
Braumiller Law Group
California, USA
View Profile
The Lawyer Network in numbers
0
+
Members Firms
0
+
Countries
0
+
Practice Areas
0
+
Member Firms
Total Staff